Expanded cellular and Wi-Fi capabilities have made streaming surveillance camera data more common in recent years, says Marc Pfeiffer, associate director of the Bloustein Local Government Research Center, part of the Center for Urban Policy Research at Rutgers University.
“Places have installed more fiber-optic networks over the years. You can tie these remote devices in so you aren’t paying cellular or hardwired circuit charges. That lets users create local Wi-Fi nodes and move the data from there,” Pfeiffer says.
Cloud storage isn’t the ideal fit for every municipality; Lewiston, for instance, chose an on-premises option because the city couldn’t find a cloud provider able to fulfill the recording speed rate requirements to stream its camera data, Starr says.
A number of hardware vendors have introduced Storage as a Service elements, Pfeiffer says, which could potentially help state and local governments simplify video data administration.
“You can buy cameras, pay for them over a number of years and get storage along with it,” he says.