Making the Case for Change Among Government Agencies
In a recent survey from the EY Center for Government Modernization, 95 percent of state and local leaders said they recognize the importance of investing in at least one emerging technology to modernize their agency. The high costs of maintaining a traditional legacy system, not to mention the licenses and other fees that are levied on the system, compound the cost of ownership and operations.
The average change cycle in a legacy deployment is usually greater than a legacy replacement, making it more difficult to be agile and implement quick changes to the application. As a result, commercial off-the-shelf and Software as a Service packages are getting higher priority for running core systems. Developers and architects to manage the legacy applications are hard to come by, and experts are either retiring or migrating to other modern technologies.
Very few people are ready to be trained in legacy technologies, which creates immense hurdles both for maintaining and developing legacy systems and for attracting the next-generation workforce. Tightly coupled applications and legacy architectures with complex interdependencies pose a huge challenge. Core systems are struggling to keep pace with citizen and business owner demands, costing them time and money.
LEARN MORE: How can a strategic application assessment help government agencies?
Modernization Trends for State and Local Governments
State and local governments are rapidly adopting a lift-and-shift approach, using modernization tools to migrate legacy applications to the cloud with low- or no-code change. These tools improve reliability and security profiles. Governments are also adopting open source and containers in a big way while rearchitecting and rebuilding legacy apps to keep costs down.
State and local governments can expect vast improvements in operational efficiency, collaboration and constituent services from modern technology, including low-code platforms, automation, cloud solutions and artificial intelligence.
The views reflected in this article are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Ernst & Young LLP or other members of the global EY organization.