Close

New Research from CDW Explores AI and Cybersecurity

Learn how AI is helping IT teams manage risk and improve resilience.

Aug 11 2026
Cloud

Hybrid Cloud Strategy for AI: Why Workload Placement Determines AI ROI

Agencies are rethinking hybrid cloud around data gravity, governance and artificial intelligence economics.

Enterprise artificial intelligence initiatives are forcing organizations to rethink hybrid cloud strategies, moving beyond simple combinations of on-premises infrastructure and public cloud services.

With AI workloads becoming more complex and distributed, government IT leaders are increasingly focused on determining where training, inference and data processing should occur to balance performance, cost, security and compliance requirements.

The result is a growing emphasis on workload placement as a foundational element of AI architecture rather than simply a tactical infrastructure decision.

Success increasingly depends on placing the right workloads in the right environments — whether on-premises, in the public cloud or at the edge — while maintaining consistent security policies, governance controls and cost management across the AI lifecycle.

Click the banner below for insights into managed cloud services.

 

What Is a Hybrid Cloud Strategy in the Context of AI?

Dave McCarthy, vice president of cloud and edge infrastructure services at IDC, says a hybrid cloud strategy in the AI era is far more than a tactical combination of on-premises hardware and public cloud instances.

“It serves as a deliberate, integrated architectural framework designed to harmonize data flows, model training, fine-tuning and inference across private facilities, public clouds and edge endpoints,” he says.

Rather than treating these environments as isolated silos, a true hybrid strategy establishes common data planes, unified security protocols and containerized workload mobility.

This allows organizations to match each phase of the AI lifecycle with the infrastructure environment that best optimizes performance, security, compliance, latency and cost.

Why Do Agencies Run in Hybrid Environments Without a Strategy?

Robert Daigle, director of global AI business at Lenovo, says that over the past two years, organizations have prioritized pilots and proofs of concept, often deploying AI wherever infrastructure and data were readily available instead of following a cohesive long-term plan.

This build-fast approach has helped validate use cases, but it has also introduced unintended consequences ranging from fragmented architectures to inconsistent governance.

“Without a clear strategy, these environments quickly accumulate technical debt, leading to suboptimal designs, duplicated infrastructure and escalating costs,” Daigle says.

In effect, many organizations have arrived at hybrid AI by necessity rather than by design.

The next phase of AI maturity will require a shift from experimentation to intentional architecture, where strategy, governance and workload placement are aligned from the outset to avoid cost overruns, reduce risk and enable scalable value creation.

Workload Placement in the AI Era: On-Premises, Cloud or Edge?

Murali Gandluru, senior vice president for data center networking at Cisco, says workload placement decisions must be driven by workload intent and specific technical requirements.

“The edge is essential for real-time inference where latency is a deal-breaker, such as autonomous systems on a factory floor,” he says.

On-premises environments are often the best choice for training models on massive proprietary data sets, where data gravity makes moving information to the cloud prohibitively expensive or risky.

He adds that the public cloud remains the ideal venue for burst capacity, rapid prototyping and access to specialized AI services that are impractical to maintain in-house.

“The leadership challenge is ensuring these choices don’t lead to forklift upgrades every time a workload needs to scale,” Gandluru says.

How To Build a Flexible Governance Framework for Distributed AI?

Pravjit Tiwana, senior vice president and general manager of cloud storage and services at NetApp, says the most successful organizations separate governance from infrastructure.

“In the past, governance was often tied to a specific environment,” he notes. “In AI, that approach breaks down because workloads, models and data are inherently distributed.”

Robert Daigle
Without a clear strategy, these environments quickly accumulate technical debt, leading to suboptimal designs, duplicated infrastructure and escalating costs.”

Robert Daigle Director of Global AI Business, Lenovo

From his perspective, governance must become policy-driven, data-centric and portable. Organizations need consistent controls for lineage, access, retention, sovereignty and model use, regardless of whether a workload runs on-premises, in a public cloud or at the edge.

McCarthy says organizations also must transition from rigid, centralized gatekeeping to automated policy-as-code guardrails embedded directly into CI/CD pipelines.

“This approach balances innovation and control by establishing global compliance baselines, such as data lineage and bias checks, while granting localized teams the autonomy to execute within those boundaries,” he explains.

Can Agencies Manage Costs and Resources Across Multiple Clouds?

Tiwana says the government agencies that succeed won’t necessarily be the ones that spend the most, but the ones that can move workloads to the most efficient environment at any time.

“That requires visibility not only into model costs but also into storage, networking, data movement and infrastructure utilization,” he says.

He points out that customers increasingly want the flexibility to run AI workloads wherever economics, performance and governance are most favorable, without rebuilding their pipelines.

“That’s one reason we believe portability across AI infrastructure will become increasingly important,” Tiwana says.

Gandluru says organizations must move beyond basic billing dashboards to full-stack observability, enabling IT leaders to correlate graphics processing unit utilization, network interface card metrics and more, while monitoring everything from GPU usage to data egress fees in one place.

“That correlation lets you make data-driven decisions about where workloads should run and catch performance bottlenecks before they hit application throughput,” he says.

The Need To Know About Security and Compliance for Hybrid AI

Daigle says AI is forcing a fundamental shift away from perimeter-based security. In a world where data, models and AI agents operate across the edge, data center and cloud, the traditional notion of a fixed boundary no longer applies.

Equally important is security at the model and training level. Organizations must ensure that training data is governed, models are validated and outputs align with enterprise policies.

This includes rigorous review processes, compliance checks and centralized oversight frameworks to manage risk throughout the AI lifecycle.

Adopting the Right AI Tactics: Roadmap for IT Leaders

McCarthy says IT leaders can move beyond lift-and-shift tactics by designing architectures around specific workload intents, mapping data dependencies, latency requirements and compliance constraints before placing compute resources.

“This transition is enabled by standardizing on cloud-native containerized platforms and a unified data fabric to ensure seamless, cost-effective portability across environments,” he says.

Daigle advises organizations to focus on placing workloads where they create the most value. That requires evaluating workloads based on performance, compliance and cost requirements rather than defaulting to a single environment.

“The most successful organizations are taking a workload-first approach by building flexible hybrid architectures that allow them to run the right workload at the right time,” he says.

AndreyPopov/Getty Images