STATETECH: What were the most significant findings for state and local government?
MARRÈ: More than half of the respondents reported that they are not at all prepared, or only somewhat prepared, to detect and recover from election-targeted cybersecurity incidents. There is a lot of room for improvement for cities, counties and states as they prepare for the 2024 elections.
Folks straddling both IT and security responsibilities feel overwhelmed, overburdened and underbudgeted. More can be done to help these great folks at the local and state levels to feel prepared, and to actually be prepared, for the election and all of the cybersecurity issues that they will face.
STATETECH: What were some of the top cyber concerns that election officials raised?
MARRÈ: There is rising concern over artificial intelligence-powered threats. Both disinformation campaigns and phishing attacks are potentially supercharged by these ubiquitous generative AI tools.
These AI tools can now be used to produce very realistic articles, social media posts, even images and audio files, all of which can allow malicious actors to inject misleading narratives or fabricated stories.
The second concern is about AI-assisted phishing attacks. Many breaches are accomplished through social engineering, particularly phishing. AI tools can help make the grammar perfect and make it look like a completely legitimate email. That makes phishing attacks very powerful.
STATETECH: In what ways are state and local teams feeling unprepared?
MARRÈ: About a third of respondents said that their budgets are somewhat inadequate or very inadequate for the task of helping to protect and secure the election. About half of respondents also said that they had not received election-specific cybersecurity awareness training, or they didn’t even know if they had received that training.